Hotheads Title


NOTE: If you arrived at this page without seeing a menu, please click on this link - - to open the entire Hotheads website in a new window.

The author asserts his right to publish this information in the public interest
No responsibility is taken for consequences resulting from using any information contained herein


There is no such thing as moderate Islam
Not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly all terrorists are Muslims
It isn't Islamophobia when they really are trying to kill you
Islam is NOT the Religion Of Peace - it is the Doctrine Of Death

Ban Genital Mutilation

Male genital mutilation has been performed for many thousands of years, originally as a religious ritual mainly by the Jews and then other religions. There was a very good reason for this, as there were for most of the Kosher laws in pre-Christian times. Back in those days, there was virtually no hygiene, no sewerage and no concept of bodily cleanliness. The only law was Rabbinical law.

Life expectancy back then was less than 40 years, so to stop the menfolk from dying even earlier from septicaemia from bacteria under the foreskin, the very wise Rabbis made it an edict from God that all men had to be circumcised and this practice has continued to the present day. However, in modern society where men have showers every day and possess all the modern tools of personal hygiene, such as soap and shampoo and modern antibiotics if by chance infection sets in, the need for male circumcision is completely negated.

One thing that has to be made perfectly clear from the start is that male circumcision involves nothing more than the removal of most of the foreskin only. It does NOT impair sexual or reproductive function in any way at all. In fact the practice of male circumcision is lessening, as more parents realise that it is a completely unnecessary surgical procedure in this modern era.


This disgusting and barbaric practice is often referred to as female circumcision to try and equate it to male circumcision and make it sound rather benign. Muslims use the term "female circumcision" only for non-Muslim consumption and propaganda, because when normal civilised people find out what this procedure is all about, they are sickened to the stomach. What Muslims say about so-called female circumcision is deliberate lying, just like they lie about most barbaric facets of Islam.

Clitoridectomy is a horrifying mutilation of the female sexual organ entailing nothing less than the amputation of the clitoris. In a male, this is equivalent to chopping off most of the penis, rendering the male incapable of sexual capability and orgasm for the rest of his life. No man, especially a Muslim man who has no qualms in ordering his daughters to undergo clitoridectomy, would consent to having the head of his penis amputated for any reason.

The purpose of clitoridectomy is to render females completely incapable of enjoying sex, in the belief that this will make them remain virgins until marriage and then stay faithful to their husbands after marriage. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), there are an estimated 100 to 140 million females who have been subjected to this disgusting mutilation. Currently, about 3 million girls, the majority under 15 years of age, undergo this unspeakable crime every year. Clitoridectomy is mainly practised by Muslims.

Unfortunately, by the time a Muslim girl or woman reports that she has been mutilated by clitoridectomy, it is too late and she is doomed to spend the rest of her life sexually unfulfilled, something that no Muslim male would ever contemplate. This shows that for most Muslim men, women are merely possessions that are there to be used for their sexual gratification, however women's sexual enjoyment is not to be tolerated.

The sad truth is that Muslim men are terrified beyond reason by the sexuality of women, thus repressing them, mutilating them and often just killing them for doing nothing more than exposing an ankle. In most Muslim nations, if a woman is raped, which is very common, she is always blamed for this and often put to death as an adultress and the male rapist goes free. This merely shows how completely perverse and barbaric Islam really is.


Most Australians hear the term clitoridectomy or female circumcision, but have absolutely no idea what it is or what it involves. Just describing this utter depravity makes this writer ill to his stomach, but everybody needs to understand what Muslims do to females and it is horrifying.

Firstly, the clitoris is amputated completely. This immediately prevents the female from ever enjoying an orgasm for the rest of her life. But it gets worse. The labia are then sewn together except for a small space so that the man can insert his penis. The entrance is about the same size as the female's anus, which suits Muslim men quite nicely, because homosexual anal sex as well as bestiality is an inherent part of Islamic culture.

In fact it has been found that in many cases, Muslim men have been having anal sex with their wives, not knowing the difference between that and vaginal sex. During the Afghanistan War, American medical officers were shocked when they were asked by Muslim men why their wives were not getting pregnant and they found that those Muslim men had absolutely no idea how to have normal sexual relations. The following news report merely confirms the utter perversity of Islam.


To show the complete idiocy and political correctness of government in relation to the atrocity that is clitoridectomy, the Melbourne Royal Women's Hospital has an entire unit devoted to this abhorrent practice. Their website states, "The Well Women’s De-infibulation Clinic offers a free, confidential service for women affected by female circumcision (FGM/C)." The mindblowing thing is that reliable reports state that between 600 and 700 women who have suffered this vile procedure attend this clinic every year - and that's just generally from the Melbourne area. That's more than 12 women each week, so it's not a random problem.

But calling it female circumcision? What kind of a sick joke is that? Clitoridectomy is not any sort of circumcision - it is the entire removal of the female clitoris to prevent women from ever again enjoying sexual fulfilment. This pack of morons who concocted this travesty of a website - and I make absolutely no excuse for calling them morons and politically correct bastards - are whitewashing this appalling mutilation by calling it female circumcision. They call it "infibulation", the technical term - they obviously are petrified to call it what people should know it as - female genital mutilation or clitoridectomy. What the hell are they scared of? Insulting those Muslim animals who support and even perform this barbarity? They should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

But to have an entire unit devoted to repairing the mostly irreparable damage done to females by those Muslim bastards - and there is no way of replacing an amputated clitoris - just shows the extent of this disgusting practice that is committed by Muslims on so many small girls and even female infants. The head of the unit in 2014 is Dr Marcus Carey. I wonder what he would think if somebody grabbed him and chopped off the head of his penis, the male equivalent to clitoridectomy? He wouldn't be very happy about that. Neither would staff gynaecologist at the unit, Dr Khairul Mohamed-Noor. He would not be pleased if somebody took a razor blade to his penis and sawed it off either.

There are some links to downloadable documents at the bottom of this web page and out of five items, only one mentions female genital mutilation in the title. All the rest call it female circumcision. Whoever wrote the text for that web page is a stupid politically correct dhimmi prick and that's about the best that I can say about them.


This report came from January 2010 and reveals the real truth about Muslim men.

An unclassified study from a military research unit in southern Afghanistan details how homosexual behavior is unusually common among men in the large ethnic group known as Pashtuns, though they seem to be in complete denial about it.

The study found that Pashtun men commonly have sex with other men, admire other men physically, have sexual relationships with boys and shun women both socially and sexually, yet they completely reject the label of "homosexual." The research was conducted as part of a longstanding effort to better understand Afghan culture and improve Western interaction with the local people.

The research unit, which was attached to a Marine battalion in southern Afghanistan, acknowledged that the behaviour of some Afghan men has left Western forces frequently confused.

The report details the bizarre interactions a US Army medic and her colleagues had with Afghan men in the southern province of Kandahar.

In one instance, a group of local male interpreters had contracted gonorrhea anally but refused to believe they could have contracted it sexually "because they were not homosexuals."

Apparently, according to the report, Pashtun men interpret the Islamic prohibition on homosexuality to mean they cannot "love" another man, but that doesn't mean they can't use men for "sexual gratification."

The group of interpreters who had contracted gonorrhea joked in the camp that they actually got the disease by mixing green and black tea. But since they refused to heed the medics' warnings, many of them re-contracted the disease after receiving treatment.

The US army medic also told members of the research unit that she and her colleagues had to explain to a local man how to get his wife pregnant.

The report said that when it was explained to him what was necessary, he reacted with disgust and asked, "How could one feel desire to be with a woman, who God has made unclean, when one could be with a man who is clean? Surely this must be wrong."

The Pashtun populations are concentrated in the southern and eastern parts of the country. The Human Terrain Team that conducted the research is part of a military effort to learn more about local populations.

The report also detailed a disturbing practice in which older "men of status" keep young boys on hand for sexual relationships. One of the country's favourite sayings, the report said, is "women are for children, boys are for pleasure."

The report concluded that the widespread homosexual behavior stems from several factors, including the severe segregation of women in the society and the prohibitive cost of marriage.

Though US troops are commonly taught in training for Afghanistan that the effeminate characteristics of Pashtun men are normal and not an indicator of homosexuality, the report said that US forces should not dismiss the unique version of homosexuality that is actually practiced in the region out of desire to avoid western discomfort.

Otherwise, the report said, Westerners could risk failing to comprehend an essential social force underlying Pashtun culture.

For those with really strong stomachs, the Winds Of Jihad website by the very appropriately named Sheik Yermani is fascinating. His article called Female Genital Mutilation Is Part Of The Sunna Of The Prophet clearly dispels the lies and propaganda that Muslims spout about clitoridectomy being an African tribal ritual and not a normal Muslim practice.

The photos of mangled, sliced, mutilated and crudely sewn up female genitalia without the use of anaesthetics would make any normal person weep and exposes the monstrous lie that female clitoridectomy is somehow akin to male circumcision. The sheer barbarity of this completely unnecessary procedure is so appalling that very few people looking at the photos would not be thoroughly sick to their stomachs.

The truth is that female genital mutilation has been an integral part of Islam since this barbaric death cult was founded. Many Muslim imams instruct their followers to ensure that their women are mutilated in this way, as it allegedly for their honour. Is there anything more dishonourable than depriving a woman of her right to enjoy orgasm? Would Muslim men ever relinquish this right? Of course not. This utter depravity is a hallmark of Islam, probably the most insidiously evil and repulsive cult that the world has ever seen.


The problem with sewing up the female labia is that this blocks the urethra opening, so urine pools in the area without escaping completely, thus leading to horrendous infections. As well, menstrual blood and other material are also trapped in the area. But apart from the pain that Muslim females endure when being forced to have sex with their men, the real agony comes with pregnancy, if the men manage to impregnate them.

Once a female's pregnancy comes to term, the baby has to come out somewhere. So the labia have to be separated, which is horrendously agonising and often performed without anaesthetic, but the normal practice is that as soon as the baby is delivered, the labia are sewn up again so that the woman does not even think about having sexual relationships until the next time she is forced to do so.


The bottom line is that Muslim men are so terrified of women and their sexuality that they have to suppress them in every way possible. This involves making women mere chattels of Muslim men, clothing them in head-to-foot sacks so that no other man can even look at them and chopping off their genitals so that they can never ever enjoy orgasm in the mistaken belief that this will keep those women faithful to those barbaric and idiotic Muslim men.

So those people who think that clitoridectomy, or that very mis-named female circumcision, is akin to male circumcision, think again. Those pathetic excuses that are Muslim males ought to imagine how they would go through life with the heads of their penises amputated and the rest of their penises sewn to their stomachs. Only then will they understand what clitoridectomy means and why the very harshest penalties should be imposed on any person who procures or performs this disgusting mutilation.

Australia and all other Western nations need to ensure that all Muslims who come to settle in these countries are informed before entry that clitoridectomy is not just barbaric, but completely illegal and will not be tolerated under any circumstances. Muslims should be strongly warned that if they perform such disgusting acts on females, that they will spend many years in prison. Even better would be to ban all Muslim immigration and keep these barbaric people right out.

The one thing that would bring the practice of clitoridectomy to a screaming halt would be to chop off the head of the penis of any man who was responsible for forcing a female to undergo clitoridectomy. That would be a very fitting punishment for such a depraved and perverted individual and well deserved.


Renowned Newtown glass artist Sergio Redegalli's Say No To Burqas mural was yet again vandalised by a bunch of cowardly Muslims in April 2012. A Muslim protest against his stance on banning the burqa was planned for 07 April 2012, but nobody showed up. The main - and completely wrong - accusation against Sergio's stance on the burqa was that it was sexist, so he decided to try something else.

Sergio Redegalli's mural
Sergio Redegalli's Say No To Female Genital Mutilation, painted in April 2012

This time, Sergio painted a Say No To Female Genital Mutilation mural on his premises and thus negated any protests that he was indeed sexist. How could any normal person protest that clitoridectomy was something that was desirable? In one fell swoop, Sergio completely stymied those Muslim protesters who believe that suppressing their females by making them wear head-to-toe sacks and chopping off their genitals is somehow acceptable.

I salute Sergio Redegalli, who has the guts to say out loud what virtually all non-Muslims are thinking, but are cowed by political correctness and accusations of racism and religious intolerance into shutting up. There should be more people like Sergio who actively fight the creeping Islamisation of Australia along with its medieval barbarism.